Charlotte Mason was orphaned at 16. She never married and never had any kids, but spent her life working with children. CM devoted everything she had to children. I hate the word "method" because it is so opposite of organic, but CM developed a philosophy that is called the Charlotte Mason method of learning. It is what's used in the Montessori schools today. And it is brilliant.
Miss Mason shared the belief that "children are persons who should be treated as individuals as they are introduced to the variety and richness of the world in which they live." It seems simple and and obvious.
Try an experiment: Take a small child on your knee. Respect him. Do not see him as something to mold, prune, or form. This is an individual who thinks, acts, and feels.
We are told by many in our generation that this small child is a possession.
What sort of person is it whom we are holding? Maybe vigorous and healthy, or malnourished and dejected? His mind may be alert or dull and neglected. Is he bored by sawdustlike religious slogans or has he been warmed at the flame of the Shepherd who has cared for him? We can only love him. We cannot own him, he is not ours.
One of the main selling points for homeschooling, in our family, is the views of children by the faculty of an institutional school. Children are not dependant on us(adults) to brainwash them into thinking any arbitrary act that we deem useful.
We think this is extremely healthy and have implemented it in our home. It works wonderfully at the Montessori schools. The children at those schools are well behaved, well versed, and exposed to quality books, games, and school work.
One of the main points that Charlotte Mason makes is to let good behaviour and good work be its own reward. Also, never to use writing, reading, or learning as a punishment or something to "get through" to go do the fun stuff.
I didn't know this in the beginning. We used stickers. When Thing 1,2, or 3 was good or did good work they got a sticker. Whoever got the most stickers got a prize out of the Good Job Bucket. We had 2 problems with this... not all my kids are on the same level behaviourally. They are different ages. Also, they have different special needs. Thing 2 has to work much, much harder to not have a temper tantrum than the other kids. So do I give him 2 stickers for not freaking out at lunchtime? It got too hard to decide. The other problem was that I did not like giving a "prize" for a kid to play with in front of the other two. It just felt wrong and it taught them that learning was a competition and that good behaviour is not worth doing unless a reward is offered. My kids even started to remind me to put a sticker on when they behaved. I knew that this was not how I wanted to parent. i did it because it was done to me at school. Now, knowing what I know, I don't have my boys participate in anything like that. They automatically get a reward from me, just for being my kids.
As an adult, living in organic church life, we would never do something like that to each other. But because kids are looked at differently, our culture uses that system. I talked to a woman recently that had this happen in her daughter's classroom. 8 kids were given special treats by the substitute because they did what the sub wanted. The woman(my friend) brought in treats for everyone to her daughter's class. The sub said "You are undermining what I am trying to do here!" and my friend replied, "Well, you are undermining what I am doing at home." My friend now homeschools her daughter.
There are a lot of things about institutions that disgust me. This system of having a flawed human decide which humans will be rewarded and which won't is one of them. The only institution that does not use this system is, like I said, the Montessori school.
I am in my opinionated blog so I feel safe in writing this. I know that there are a lot of people who will disagree with me and I appreciate that we are not all the same. I enjoy differences in my friends and family's point of views and love and value them just as much as ever. If you are reading this a don't agree, it's okay with me. I just really, really, wanted to get this out. Sometimes a blog will sit in my heart eating away at me until I finally sit down to type it. This is one of those.
I want to write just a little more about the philosophy that's developed in our house over the years... I am fascinated with curriculum, books, learning styles, and so on. I spend hours upon hours writing year long plans for our homeschool. What I am not good at is "teaching." My MIL is a teacher and has shared with me some of the things they do in her classroom. She has taught for 50 year and has a Master's degree in the profession. For all that, she is well read in twaddle(twaddle is the stuff the schools are giving to kids these days) and she knows how to organize and teach a classroom. When it comes to homeschooling and what we do, her degree doesn't matter. If anything, I have found that her degree works against her. Homeschooling isn't about teaching kids. In our house homeschooling is following them on their learning journey and showing them where to find what they need. When I try to teach them something that is of no interest to them, they forget it. We are very relaxed in our school and because of this I no longer have to fight with the kids to do school. They do far more than I ever could have "made" them. It's because we began treating them like equal members of the family. It's very similar to the belief that christians can't know what to do without a pastor. So far, we are growing and experiencing Christ more than we did before when we had the 'leader.'
Hopefully this will give a little glimpse into how parenting/learning can work without the typical reward/punishment chart system. I am also very excited to write about Charlotte Mason. I whole heartedly agree with her life's work and will take every opportunity to write about her and pass on the info that's been so useful to me.
If you read this and don't agree, leave a comment. I love to hear opinions and to know what other moms and dads do that work for them.
In either case, thanks for reading!
Love,
Jackie
Even if you don't think highly of public/traditional schooling, the skills and knowledge your mother-in-law has could still be helpful. Rather than dismissing everything she's obtained, why not be more open to discussion. She might have something valuable to offer your kids that you, not being an experienced, degreed teacher, might not even be aware of.
ReplyDeleteJenny, thank you so much for reading and replying. I agree wholeheartedly that the skills and knowledge of a trained teacher are valuable, just as with anyone trained in a skill. When I mentioned that the training can sometimes work against the professional is because learning doesn't always require teaching. It's a natural part of life. We are born with and have a built in desire to learn and discover. Just watch a toddler for 5 minutes and it's obvious! It's scary to trust that a child will learn what he or she needs simply because they want to. I know from talking with teachers(including my knowledgable MIL) that it doesn't matter if a child is ready to learn a perticular skill, they learn it anyway in school because the class learns it. What the child memorizes for tests becomes the focal point rather than if they are actually ready to learn it, and if they are ready, are they learning it in the way they learn best.
ReplyDeleteI am a firm believer that being my child's primary caregiver and teacher throughout life, designated to me by my husband, designated to him by the Lord, I am the most qualified to teach them. All the degrees in the world could not train anyone better to bring my child up in the Lord. And that includes academics.
Let me give an illustration, if a person is trained to be a surgeon and they are the best surgeon in the world that does not mean that they would be good at assisting a home birth. Both are "qualified" to deliver a baby, but in very different ways. And yes, the surgeon could teach the midwife a few things, but because the midwife has a different philosophy, much of it wouldn't be necessary.
I hope that makes sense. I appreciate you taking the time to write.
Have a great weekend!
In Him,
Jackie
I re-read your comment and have to wonder if you maybe misunderstood my blog post. I do talk with alot of former teachers and I am open to discussion. I would never discard anything that a fellow Sister in Christ shares. Wisdom comes from all places. I am not an experienced teacher, yes, but beyond that, I am not a teacher at all. I am a mom. Teachers teach, I parent. Our schooling is a continuation of my parenting. If life offered advanced degrees in parenting, I might be all ears :), but because my MIL's degree is in teaching, that's not what I do. I also am a part of an organic church. In our church, Christ is the head. That elimintates the need for a pastor. It's the same deal with school... with me, mama, taking head role in guiding my boys through life, we have no need for a teacher. I value and respect teachers for teaching me, but when it comes to my kids we are doing something different. The advice and tips that mean most to me come from those who spend a lot of time with my family and who know my boys best. I am not trying to sway how you feel about education or what it should be. Each of us has our own priorities and values in raising our kids. I am just shedding light on how we live and why someone with a degree may not necessarily know anything about how my kids learn best.
ReplyDeleteAlso, John Holt, a teacher for three decades and New York's teacher of the year 2 years in a row, is a huge advacate of the type of learning that I also happen to encourage. He talks about his degree working against him often when it comes to child-led learning.
Again, thanks for posting and if you have any questions I'd be happy to share some more.
Jesus is Awesome,
Jackie
I understand a little about what the "organic church" movement's about, and I'm familiar with Charlotte Mason. Yes, learning isn't all about being formally taught, but it is an element. Just because John Holt and others believes that his training worked against him doesn't necessarily mean that your mother-in-law or everyone believes the same. My mother is a college lecturer, and she believes that her experience did help when homeschooling us, however informal it was. It's not my intention to criticize your methods or convince you to try something else.
ReplyDelete